All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
Do Minorities Deserve College More Than The Rest?
Poor and starving kids in East St. Louis walk through halls laden with sewage. They don’t even have the chance to go to school half the time because the sewage is toxic and could harm them. More than half of the senior girls are pregnant and don’t care about life anymore. This is something that every kid that is working hard to get into a good college is thinking about. They are wondering if they won’t get into the college of their choice because of affirmative action. Affirmative action gives you extra brownie points on your resume, which makes you more likely to get in. Many teenagers that have great grades and test scores are not getting accepted because they are not part of a minority. The arising question is affirmative action the right thing to do or is it just making racism worse? Or is it fair that someone that is poor and came from a bad school should get extra points, because they didn’t get as good of an education as someone who went to a private school? What has America come to, accepting minorities just to have diversity in their school, even if it is sacrificing integrity and school pride.
Working hard your whole life and having a resume as long as the Chicago Towers is high and still getting rejected by a college. That’s what affirmative action is, it allows minorities extra points on their resume just because they are a minority. I don’t about you but I don’t think that is even close to being right. Someone could work their whole life to get into a good college and another person could coast their whole life and get in just because they are a minority. You should have to meet standards because it is not fair that this should ever happen to any hard working American. We should make sure that person that gets in on extra points is actually tries and doesn’t waist it, and if he waist it then they should kick him out and accept the hard worker. Sounds like something Obama would support.
True the people in poverty stricken areas don’t have the best education, but they could make the most of it and try harder. By trying harder and showing the colleges that you try hard even though you don’t go to the best school will set you apart from the rest of the applicants. I think they should look longer and harder at your resume if you come from a poverty stricken area, but not give you bonus points and especially not a lot. As long as you have good grades and try hard then they aren’t going to be beat out by some lazy rich kid.
Racism has been around for hundreds of years and will probably continue for a while. Race should have nothing to do with getting into college, it should be based on how you perform. So many people have tried to create diversity in the colleges, but is that really better? Do we want to accept someone that might not be as good as another person but is a minority? This could lower their schools average test score if you do this too much, but if you control it then it could give benefits. If you control it then you will have diversity and keep the high test averages. Besides when you use affirmative action it is just flipping the tables on racism. You just started to accept a lot of minorities but now you left out the middle class white person and that’s not fair. So you have to find that perfect median or else it doesn’t work.
Lowering test scores to create diversity in colleges, and sacrificing school pride to make sure the diversities get an equal shot at getting in. If you are trying to get into Harvard and get rejected because they accepted someone that isn’t as smart as you, but they are a minority that doesn’t seem fair. It’s not fair that the smarter person wasn’t accepted because he isn’t a minority. This is why many people don’t like affirmative action, but I think there can be a balance between minorities and none minorities. That is what affirmative action should try to do! It should create that balance so that smart people get a chance and the minorities that try hard and work hard get a chance.
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 62 comments.
I feel you make some decent points, but as many people have already said, your argument is very one-sided; you don't consider any arguments the other side may produce, and you didn't qualify (words like "most" or "many" or "some")any of the broad statements you made, nor did you back any of them up with hard facts. This, combined with your grammer issues that I'll talk about in a minute, completely kills any credibility you have as an author, and for the most part, any reader who doesn't toss your piece away at first glance will simply tear it apart in just a few arguments--as many commenters have already done.
Grammer. It's a big deal for any piece of writing, but it's especially important for this piece. Because you're talking about your quality of work versus the minorities' quality of work, specifically how yours is better. But at the same time, you're using incorrect homophones, spelling words wrong, messing up on grammar, and even leaving out words. By making these mistakes, you've completely contradicted the point you were trying to prove, and what you wrote to be an argument has become a parody.
Remember to qualify any statement that might in some cases, even if you feel that these cases are very rare, be untrue. It's like playing the card game BS or Cheat (hopefully you know the game so this analogy makes sense). Unless you know that no one else in the game has an eight (i.e. you have them all, etc.), you don't play four eights because all it takes is for one person to have just one eight to prove that you're wrong. By the same token, if you say that all minorities are worse students than whites (whether you meant it or not, that's the message that comes accross), then all it takes is one minority-status person to leave an intelligently worded offended comment to make your entire argument fall apart.
So, all in all, I'd definitely rethink this essay if I were you. There's a point or two in there that are worth salvaging, but the way you presented them and your other points makes your essay very easy to argue with, and because of that, you're actually helping the other side of the argument.
0 articles 0 photos 36 comments
I think you are making a good argument here. Certainly not all of those in minority groups are accepted into schools just because of their race, but a good many are, and I believe that is really unfair. I am going through similar situations at my high school.
It hurts when all that determines your acceptance into school, is that little bubble you shade in with your pencil on the application paper that says: RACE. That's what education comes down to nowadays. It's really sad, and I hope our generation can work together (regardless of race) and fix this roadblock.